For the second question would it be rational to say that if you have 80% of success with a 500$ outcome and a 20% of loosing 500$ then over 5 theoretical trades you would make 1500$ while if you had 100% chance of a successful outcome of 280$ then over 5 theoretical tries then your profit would only be 1400$ so the option A would be the correct awenser and vise versa for the first question. Is this assumption correct ?
I'm from india a 20 year old kid. , interested to build career in finance, dream of becoming the investment banker and lot more any guide or suggestions for mr
I've been thinking about this whole investment think. Somehow, I think the equations are wrong, Here's what I think. You have 1$. You go and buy bread. 1$ = 1 bread. You have 1$. You go and invest. After a day, if everything goes really well, you get 2 $. But 1$ != 2$. So, during that time, something happened to the dollar. What exactly happened? Well, the value of the stocks fluctuated. Because of the fluctuation, the stocks you invested in gained more value. So, the value of the $ you invested represents a function that describes the fluctuation. But since it represents something different than the $ you used to buy bread, it's not correct to use the same sign. You can't use the same notation for something that represents a fluctuation and also something that represent value at a given moment. So, in order for this to make sense, you need to consider that the $ you use to invest is actually d$/dt. A derivative. In the same way acceleration is the derivative of speed.
24 comments
46.11) something is cooking
Awesome 👏
great video.
I just have a question, I can't find videos #4 and #22.. 😞
Just watching this to fall asleep 😐
Thank you.
Thanks
Underwhelming
Nice one
💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣
For the second question would it be rational to say that if you have 80% of success with a 500$ outcome and a 20% of loosing 500$ then over 5 theoretical trades you would make 1500$ while if you had 100% chance of a successful outcome of 280$ then over 5 theoretical tries then your profit would only be 1400$ so the option A would be the correct awenser and vise versa for the first question. Is this assumption correct ?
Little known fact Choongbum Lee is an amazing roller skater
I'm from india a 20 year old kid. , interested to build career in finance, dream of becoming the investment banker and lot more any guide or suggestions for mr
Good job sir ji ❤❤❤❤❤
26:34
When in doubt hedge it out
I've been thinking about this whole investment think. Somehow, I think the equations are wrong, Here's what I think. You have 1$. You go and buy bread. 1$ = 1 bread. You have 1$. You go and invest. After a day, if everything goes really well, you get 2 $. But 1$ != 2$. So, during that time, something happened to the dollar. What exactly happened? Well, the value of the stocks fluctuated. Because of the fluctuation, the stocks you invested in gained more value. So, the value of the $ you invested represents a function that describes the fluctuation. But since it represents something different than the $ you used to buy bread, it's not correct to use the same sign. You can't use the same notation for something that represents a fluctuation and also something that represent value at a given moment. So, in order for this to make sense, you need to consider that the $ you use to invest is actually d$/dt. A derivative. In the same way acceleration is the derivative of speed.
THANKS A LOT SIR (AACHARY) 🙏
30:29 ironic hearing this now, carry trades hitting market rn
Is this the financial Asian guy from that Batman movie? IYKYK
I wish I could give 1000 likes to him ❤
This is gold! Thank you!!
I take all Classes and I am Blessed bcause I am online student of MIT
Thanks to Aaron Swartz (RIP)
41:04 priccingmodel